Blackmagic Design URSA Mini 4.6K Monture EF vs Fujifilm XF10
Prices & availability
Specification comparison
Highlighted rows differ between the two models.
| Specification | Blackmagic Design URSA Mini 4.6K Monture EF | Fujifilm XF10 |
|---|---|---|
| Type | ||
| Type (difference) | Cinema mirrorless | Compact expert |
| Sensor | ||
| Sensor format | APS-C | APS-C |
| Resolution (MP) (difference) | 5 MP | 24 MP |
| Mount | ||
| Mount (difference) | Canon EF | Objectif fixe (Fujinon 18.5mm f/2.8 — 28 mm eq.) |
| Performance | ||
| Burst (difference) | — | 6.0 fps |
| Video (difference) | 4.6K 60 | 4K 15 (cropé) |
| IBIS | No | No |
| Build | ||
| Release year (difference) | 2016 | 2018 |
| Price (€) (difference) | €4,900 | €500 |
Verdict
Pick the Blackmagic URSA Mini 4.6K if you prioritize high-resolution video (4.6K at 60fps) and a cinema-oriented workflow, despite its bulk and lack of stabilization. Opt for the Fujifilm XF10 if portability, a 24.2MP stills resolution, and a more affordable price outweigh the need for professional video specs or fast burst shooting. The XF10 stays the better choice for casual or travel photography, while the URSA Mini 4.6K remains the clear pick for dedicated video work.