Blackmagic Design URSA Mini Pro 12K vs Canon EOS R3
Prices & availability
Specification comparison
Highlighted rows differ between the two models.
| Specification | Blackmagic Design URSA Mini Pro 12K | Canon EOS R3 |
|---|---|---|
| Type | ||
| Type (difference) | Cinema mirrorless | Mirrorless |
| Sensor | ||
| Sensor format | Full frame | Full frame |
| Resolution (MP) (difference) | 80 MP | 24 MP |
| Mount | ||
| Mount (difference) | PL | Canon RF |
| Performance | ||
| Video (difference) | 12K Super 35 BRAW | 6K RAW / 4K 120 |
| IBIS (difference) | No | Yes |
| Build | ||
| Release year (difference) | 2020 | 2021 |
| Price (€) (difference) | €10,000 | €6,000 |
Verdict
Pick the Blackmagic URSA Mini Pro 12K if your priority is maximum resolution and RAW video in a cinema-focused body, especially for Super 35 workflows. The Canon EOS R3 stays the better choice if you need in-body stabilization, higher frame rates in 4K, or a hybrid stills/video mirrorless design with lower-resolution but more versatile video options.