Blackmagic Design URSA Mini Pro 12K vs Leica M (Typ 262)
Prices & availability
Specification comparison
Highlighted rows differ between the two models.
| Specification | Blackmagic Design URSA Mini Pro 12K | Leica M (Typ 262) |
|---|---|---|
| Type | ||
| Type (difference) | Cinema mirrorless | Mirrorless |
| Sensor | ||
| Sensor format | Full frame | Full frame |
| Resolution (MP) (difference) | 80 MP | 24 MP |
| Mount | ||
| Mount (difference) | PL | Leica M |
| Performance | ||
| Burst (difference) | — | 3.0 fps |
| Video (difference) | 12K Super 35 BRAW | — |
| IBIS | No | No |
| Build | ||
| Release year (difference) | 2020 | 2015 |
| Price (€) (difference) | €10,000 | €5,300 |
Verdict
Pick the Blackmagic URSA Mini Pro 12K if you prioritize ultra-high-resolution video and future-proofing for professional cinema work, despite its lack of stabilization. The Leica M (Typ 262) stays the better choice if you value a compact, stills-focused system with a proven rangefinder design and are content with 24MP stills and modest burst shooting.