Blackmagic Design URSA Mini Pro 4.6K - Monture Canon EF vs Fujifilm X-Pro 3 Dura
Prices & availability
Specification comparison
Highlighted rows differ between the two models.
| Specification | Blackmagic Design URSA Mini Pro 4.6K - Monture Canon EF | Fujifilm X-Pro 3 Dura |
|---|---|---|
| Type | ||
| Type (difference) | Cinema mirrorless | Mirrorless |
| Sensor | ||
| Sensor format | APS-C | APS-C |
| Resolution (MP) (difference) | 5 MP | 26 MP |
| Mount | ||
| Mount (difference) | Canon EF | Fujifilm X |
| Performance | ||
| Burst (difference) | — | 11.0 fps |
| Video (difference) | 4.6K 60 | 4K 30 |
| IBIS | No | No |
| Build | ||
| Release year (difference) | 2017 | 2019 |
| Price (€) (difference) | €6,500 | €2,200 |
Verdict
Pick the Blackmagic URSA Mini Pro 4.6K if your priority is high-resolution video at a lower price, especially for cinema work where 4.6K and 60fps matter more than stills. The Fujifilm X-Pro 3 Dura stays the better choice if you need a hybrid camera for fast-action photography (11fps burst) and 26.1MP stills, or prefer 4K 30 video in a more compact, photo-focused body—provided you’re willing to pay the premium.