Blackmagic Design URSA Mini Pro 4.6K - Monture Canon EF vs Panasonic AU-EVA1 5.7K Cinema Caméscope
Prices & availability
Specification comparison
Highlighted rows differ between the two models.
| Specification | Blackmagic Design URSA Mini Pro 4.6K - Monture Canon EF | Panasonic AU-EVA1 5.7K Cinema Caméscope |
|---|---|---|
| Type | ||
| Type | Cinema mirrorless | Cinema mirrorless |
| Sensor | ||
| Sensor format | APS-C | APS-C |
| Resolution (MP) (difference) | 5 MP | 24 MP |
| Mount | ||
| Mount | Canon EF | Canon EF |
| Performance | ||
| Video (difference) | 4.6K 60 | 5.7K RAW (sortie externe) |
| IBIS | No | No |
| Build | ||
| Release year | 2017 | 2017 |
| Price (€) (difference) | €6,500 | €7,500 |
Verdict
Pick the Blackmagic URSA Mini Pro 4.6K if you prioritize a lower budget and sufficient 4.6K resolution for most projects, or if internal recording at high resolutions meets your workflow. The Panasonic AU-EVA1 stays the better choice if you need the higher 5.7K RAW output (via external recorder) and can justify the extra cost, or if the 24MP stills capability is a deciding factor.