Canon Cinema EOS C200 - Monture EF vs Ricoh GR IV Monochrome
Prices & availability
Specification comparison
Highlighted rows differ between the two models.
| Specification | Canon Cinema EOS C200 - Monture EF | Ricoh GR IV Monochrome |
|---|---|---|
| Type | ||
| Type (difference) | Cinema mirrorless | Compact expert |
| Sensor | ||
| Sensor format | APS-C | APS-C |
| Resolution (MP) (difference) | 9 MP | 16 MP |
| Mount | ||
| Mount (difference) | Canon EF | Objectif fixe (28mm f/2.8 eq.) |
| Performance | ||
| Burst (difference) | — | 4.0 fps |
| Video (difference) | 4K UHD 60 Cinema RAW Light | 1080p 30 |
| IBIS | No | No |
| Build | ||
| Release year (difference) | 2017 | 2013 |
| Price (€) (difference) | €7,500 | €800 |
Verdict
Pick the Canon C200 if you need 4K UHD video at 60 fps with Cinema RAW Light or prioritize cinema-grade workflows. Choose the Ricoh GR IV Monochrome if high-resolution black-and-white stills and compact portability are your focus, and 1080p video suffices. The C200 remains the better choice for hybrid shooters needing professional video specs, while the GR IV stays unmatched for dedicated monochrome photography at this price.