Canon EF 17-35mm f/2.8 L USM vs Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM - Monture Canon EF
Prices & availability
Specification comparison
Highlighted rows differ between the two models.
| Specification | Canon EF 17-35mm f/2.8 L USM | Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM - Monture Canon EF |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Mount | canon-ef | canon-ef |
| Optics | ||
| Focal (difference) | 17-35 mm | 70-200 mm |
| Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Prime | No | No |
| Stabilization (difference) | No | Yes |
Verdict
Pick Model A if you need a wide-angle zoom for landscapes, architecture, or tight spaces and prioritize a broader field of view. Choose Model B if telephoto reach for portraits, sports, or wildlife is more critical, especially at a lower price. Model A stays the better choice if you require ultra-wide coverage, while Model B’s longer focal range and stabilization make it the stronger pick for distant subjects.