Canon EF 200mm f/1.8 L USM vs Canon EF 300mm f/2.8 L IS USM
Prices & availability
Specification comparison
Highlighted rows differ between the two models.
| Specification | Canon EF 200mm f/1.8 L USM | Canon EF 300mm f/2.8 L IS USM |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Mount | canon-ef | canon-ef |
| Optics | ||
| Focal (difference) | 200 mm | 300 mm |
| Aperture (difference) | f/1.8 | f/2.8 |
| Prime | Yes | Yes |
| Stabilization (difference) | No | Yes |
Verdict
Pick Model A if you prioritize a brighter f/1.8 aperture for low-light performance and shallower depth of field at 200mm, or if budget is a key factor. Choose Model B if you need the extra reach of 300mm and can accept the slightly slower f/2.8 aperture, especially if stabilization is valuable for handheld shooting.