Canon EF 200mm f/2.8 L II USM vs Canon EF 35mm f/2 IS USM
Prices & availability
Specification comparison
Highlighted rows differ between the two models.
| Specification | Canon EF 200mm f/2.8 L II USM | Canon EF 35mm f/2 IS USM |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Mount | canon-ef | canon-ef |
| Optics | ||
| Focal (difference) | 200 mm | 35 mm |
| Aperture (difference) | f/2.8 | f/2.0 |
| Prime | Yes | Yes |
| Stabilization (difference) | No | Yes |
Verdict
Pick Model A if you need a fast telephoto reach for portraits or low-light action; its 200 mm and f/2.8 aperture deliver tighter framing and shallower depth than the 35 mm can. Choose Model B if you prefer a wider, stabilized walk-around lens for everyday scenes or dim interiors; its f/2 and 35 mm field of view suit broader compositions at a lower cost.