Canon EF 200mm f/2.8 L II USM vs Sigma 20mm f/1.4 DG HSM ART - Monture Canon EF
Prices & availability
Specification comparison
Highlighted rows differ between the two models.
| Specification | Canon EF 200mm f/2.8 L II USM | Sigma 20mm f/1.4 DG HSM ART - Monture Canon EF |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Mount | canon-ef | canon-ef |
| Optics | ||
| Focal (difference) | 200 mm | 20 mm |
| Aperture (difference) | f/2.8 | f/1.4 |
| Prime | Yes | Yes |
| Stabilization | No | No |
Verdict
Pick Model A if you need a longer telephoto reach for subjects like sports or wildlife and can work with its f/2.8 aperture. Choose Model B if a bright f/1.4 ultra-wide angle for low-light or creative depth-of-field is more critical to your work, despite the higher price. Neither lens replaces the other’s focal length, so the decision hinges solely on your framing needs.