Canon EF 200mm f/2.8 L II USM vs Sigma 24mm f/1.4 DG HSM ART - Monture Canon EF
Prices & availability
Specification comparison
Highlighted rows differ between the two models.
| Specification | Canon EF 200mm f/2.8 L II USM | Sigma 24mm f/1.4 DG HSM ART - Monture Canon EF |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Mount | canon-ef | canon-ef |
| Optics | ||
| Focal (difference) | 200 mm | 24 mm |
| Aperture (difference) | f/2.8 | f/1.4 |
| Prime | Yes | Yes |
| Stabilization | No | No |
| Build | ||
| Weight (g) (difference) | — | 665,000 g |
Verdict
Pick Model A if you need a longer telephoto reach for subjects like sports or wildlife and can work with its f/2.8 aperture. Model B stays the better choice if you prioritize a bright f/1.4 aperture for low-light or shallow depth-of-field shots at a wide 24mm focal length. Budget favors Model A by 50 EUR, but the decision hinges solely on focal length and aperture needs.