Canon EF 200mm f/2.8 L II USM vs Sigma 50mm f/1.4 DG HSM ART - Monture Canon EF
Prices & availability
Specification comparison
Highlighted rows differ between the two models.
| Specification | Canon EF 200mm f/2.8 L II USM | Sigma 50mm f/1.4 DG HSM ART - Monture Canon EF |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Mount | canon-ef | canon-ef |
| Optics | ||
| Focal (difference) | 200 mm | 50 mm |
| Aperture (difference) | f/2.8 | f/1.4 |
| Prime | Yes | Yes |
| Stabilization | No | No |
Verdict
Pick Model A if you need a longer telephoto reach for subjects like sports or wildlife and can work with the slightly dimmer f/2.8 aperture. Model B stays the better choice if you prioritize low-light performance and a brighter f/1.4 aperture for portraits or general use, or if the 50mm focal length suits your framing needs. Budget favors Model A by 40 EUR, but only if the 200mm focal length aligns with your shooting style.