Canon EF 200mm f/2 L IS USM vs Canon EF 50mm f/1.0 L USM
Prices & availability
Specification comparison
Highlighted rows differ between the two models.
| Specification | Canon EF 200mm f/2 L IS USM | Canon EF 50mm f/1.0 L USM |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Mount | canon-ef | canon-ef |
| Optics | ||
| Focal (difference) | 200 mm | 50 mm |
| Aperture (difference) | f/2.0 | f/1.0 |
| Prime | Yes | Yes |
| Stabilization (difference) | Yes | No |
Verdict
Pick Model A if you need a longer reach and image stabilization for handheld telephoto shots, or if budget is a concern. Model B stays the better choice if you prioritize low-light performance and shallow depth-of-field at a standard focal length, and the higher price is justified by its wider aperture.