Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L USM vs Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 EX APO DG OS HSM - Monture Canon EF
Prices & availability
Specification comparison
Highlighted rows differ between the two models.
| Specification | Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L USM | Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 EX APO DG OS HSM - Monture Canon EF |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Mount | canon-ef | canon-ef |
| Optics | ||
| Focal (difference) | 24-70 mm | 120-300 mm |
| Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Prime | No | No |
| Stabilization (difference) | No | Yes |
Verdict
Pick Model A if you need a versatile wide-to-short-telephoto zoom for general photography, portraits, or events at a lower price. Choose Model B if your priority is sports, wildlife, or distant subjects, and you require the extra reach without sacrificing a constant f/2.8 aperture. Model A stays the better choice if budget or compactness matters, while Model B is the clear winner for telephoto needs.