Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS III USM vs Sigma 60-600mm f/4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM SPORT - Monture Canon EF
Prices & availability
Specification comparison
Highlighted rows differ between the two models.
| Specification | Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS III USM | Sigma 60-600mm f/4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM SPORT - Monture Canon EF |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Mount | canon-ef | canon-ef |
| Optics | ||
| Focal (difference) | 70-200 mm | 60-600 mm |
| Aperture (difference) | f/2.8 | f/4.5-6.3 |
| Prime | No | No |
| Stabilization | Yes | Yes |
Verdict
Pick Model A if you prioritize a brighter f/2.8 aperture for low-light performance and shallower depth of field, or need a more compact, lighter telephoto zoom. Choose Model B if your work demands extreme reach up to 600 mm and you can accept the slower variable aperture, especially for wildlife or sports where the extra focal length outweighs the aperture trade-off.