Canon EOS 2000D vs Nikon D3400
Prices & availability
Specification comparison
Highlighted rows differ between the two models.
| Specification | Canon EOS 2000D | Nikon D3400 |
|---|---|---|
| Type | ||
| Type | DSLR | DSLR |
| Sensor | ||
| Sensor format | APS-C | APS-C |
| Resolution (MP) | 24 MP | 24 MP |
| Mount | ||
| Mount (difference) | Canon EF / EF-S | Nikon F |
| Performance | ||
| Burst (difference) | 3.0 fps | 5.0 fps |
| Video (difference) | 1080p 30 | 1080p 60 |
| IBIS | No | No |
| Build | ||
| Weight (g) (difference) | 475 g | — |
| Release year (difference) | 2018 | 2016 |
| Price (€) (difference) | €430 | €500 |
Verdict
Pick the Nikon D3400 if you prioritize a slightly faster burst rate (5 fps vs. 3 fps) and smoother 1080p 60 video over the Canon’s 30 fps. The Canon EOS 2000D stays the better choice if you prefer a marginally newer model (2018 vs. 2016) and are willing to pay €10 more for it. Both share nearly identical resolution and lack in-body stabilization, so the decision hinges on video frame rate or release year.