Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR vs Fujifilm XF 8-16mm f/2.8 R LM WR
Prices & availability
Specification comparison
Highlighted rows differ between the two models.
| Specification | Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR | Fujifilm XF 8-16mm f/2.8 R LM WR |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Mount | fujifilm-x | fujifilm-x |
| Optics | ||
| Focal (difference) | 50-140 mm | 8-16 mm |
| Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Prime | No | No |
| Stabilization (difference) | Yes | No |
| Build | ||
| Weight (g) (difference) | 995,000 g | 805,000 g |
Verdict
Pick the XF 50-140mm if you need a telephoto zoom for portraits, events, or sports and can accept its heavier build. Choose the XF 8-16mm if ultra-wide landscapes, architecture, or tight interiors are your priority and you prefer a slightly lighter lens. Both share the same constant f/2.8 aperture, so the decision hinges solely on focal-length needs and weight tolerance. Budget is effectively equal.