Leica M-E (Typ 220) vs Leica Q (Typ 116)
Prices & availability
Specification comparison
Highlighted rows differ between the two models.
| Specification | Leica M-E (Typ 220) | Leica Q (Typ 116) |
|---|---|---|
| Type | ||
| Type (difference) | Mirrorless | Compact expert |
| Sensor | ||
| Sensor format | Full frame | Full frame |
| Resolution (MP) (difference) | 18 MP | 24 MP |
| Mount | ||
| Mount (difference) | Leica M | Objectif fixe (Summilux 28mm f/1.7) |
| Performance | ||
| Burst (difference) | 2.0 fps | 10.0 fps |
| Video (difference) | — | 1080p 60 |
| IBIS | No | No |
| Build | ||
| Release year (difference) | 2012 | 2015 |
| Price (€) (difference) | €5,500 | €4,200 |
Verdict
Pick the Leica Q (Typ 116) if you prioritize higher resolution, faster burst shooting, or video capability—its 24 MP sensor and 10 fps make it more versatile for dynamic scenes. The Leica M-E (Typ 220) stays the better choice if you prefer a traditional rangefinder experience or need compatibility with M-mount lenses, as its mirrorless design and older 18 MP sensor cater to purists over specs. Both share the same price, so the decision hinges on workflow and feature needs.