Leica X (Typ 113) vs Ricoh GR IIIx HDF
Prices & availability
Specification comparison
Highlighted rows differ between the two models.
| Specification | Leica X (Typ 113) | Ricoh GR IIIx HDF |
|---|---|---|
| Type | ||
| Type | Compact expert | Compact expert |
| Sensor | ||
| Sensor format | APS-C | APS-C |
| Resolution (MP) (difference) | 16 MP | 24 MP |
| Mount | ||
| Mount | Objectif fixe (Summilux 23mm f/1.7 — 35 mm eq.) | Objectif fixe (40mm f/2.8 eq.) |
| Performance | ||
| Burst (difference) | 5.0 fps | 4.0 fps |
| Video (difference) | 1080p 30 | 1080p 60 |
| IBIS (difference) | No | Yes |
| Build | ||
| Release year (difference) | 2014 | 2024 |
| Price (€) (difference) | €2,300 | €1,200 |
Verdict
Pick the Ricoh GR IIIx HDF if you prioritize higher resolution, in-body stabilization, and a more recent release for better low-light performance and video flexibility. The Leica X (Typ 113) stays the better choice if you value a slightly faster burst rate or prefer its design and ergonomics, given its older but still capable specifications. Budget-conscious buyers may lean toward the Ricoh, while those indifferent to price might weigh handling preferences more heavily.