Leica X Vario (Typ 107) vs Ricoh GR IIIx
Prices & availability
Specification comparison
Highlighted rows differ between the two models.
| Specification | Leica X Vario (Typ 107) | Ricoh GR IIIx |
|---|---|---|
| Type | ||
| Type | Compact expert | Compact expert |
| Sensor | ||
| Sensor format | APS-C | APS-C |
| Resolution (MP) (difference) | 16 MP | 24 MP |
| Mount | ||
| Mount | Objectif fixe (Vario-Elmar 18-46mm — 28-70 mm eq.) | Objectif fixe (40mm f/2.8 eq.) |
| Performance | ||
| Burst (difference) | 5.0 fps | 4.0 fps |
| Video (difference) | 1080p 30 | 1080p 60 |
| IBIS (difference) | No | Yes |
| Build | ||
| Weight (g) (difference) | — | 257 g |
| Release year (difference) | 2013 | 2021 |
| Price (€) (difference) | €2,500 | €1,000 |
Verdict
Pick the Ricoh GR IIIx if you prioritize higher resolution, in-body stabilization, and a more recent sensor in a lighter body—its 1080p/60 video and modern features justify the slight price premium. The Leica X Vario stays the better choice if you value a faster burst rate (5 fps) and prefer its design, though its older specs and lack of stabilization may limit versatility. Budget-conscious buyers should note the negligible €40 difference, making the GR IIIx the more future-proof option.