Nikon AF Nikkor 18-35mm f/3.5-4.5 D IF-ED vs Tamron AF 28-300mm f/3.5-6.3 XR Di VC LD Aspherical (IF) - Monture Nikon
Prices & availability
Tamron AF 28-300mm f/3.5-6.3 XR Di VC LD Aspherical (IF) - Monture Nikon
€82In stock
Best Deal · €82View detailsSpecification comparison
Highlighted rows differ between the two models.
| Specification | Nikon AF Nikkor 18-35mm f/3.5-4.5 D IF-ED | Tamron AF 28-300mm f/3.5-6.3 XR Di VC LD Aspherical (IF) - Monture Nikon |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Mount | nikon-f | nikon-f |
| Optics | ||
| Focal (difference) | 18-35 mm | 28-300 mm |
| Aperture (difference) | f/3.5-4.5 | f/3.5-6.3 |
| Prime | No | No |
| Stabilization (difference) | No | Yes |
Verdict
Pick Model A if you prioritize a wider field of view for landscapes or tight spaces and prefer consistent low-light performance at the wide end. Model B stays the better choice if you need extreme telephoto reach for travel or wildlife and can accept the dimmer maximum aperture at longer focal lengths. Both deliver identical used pricing, so the decision hinges solely on focal-length needs.