Nikon AF Nikkor 24-120mm f/3.5-5.6D vs Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 AT-X Pro DX - Monture Nikon
Prices & availability
Specification comparison
Highlighted rows differ between the two models.
| Specification | Nikon AF Nikkor 24-120mm f/3.5-5.6D | Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 AT-X Pro DX - Monture Nikon |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Mount | nikon-f | nikon-f |
| Optics | ||
| Focal (difference) | 24-120 mm | 11-16 mm |
| Aperture (difference) | f/3.5-5.6 | f/2.8 |
| Prime | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | No |
Verdict
Pick Model A if you need a versatile walk-around zoom with a broad 24-120mm range and don’t mind the variable f/3.5-5.6 aperture. Model B stays the better choice if you prioritize ultra-wide 11-16mm coverage, a constant f/2.8 aperture, and lower cost for specialized wide-angle shooting.