Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 55-200mm f/4-5.6G ED VR II vs Sigma 17-35mm f/2.8-4 EX DG HSM - Monture Nikon
Prices & availability
Specification comparison
Highlighted rows differ between the two models.
| Specification | Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 55-200mm f/4-5.6G ED VR II | Sigma 17-35mm f/2.8-4 EX DG HSM - Monture Nikon |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Mount | nikon-f | nikon-f |
| Optics | ||
| Focal (difference) | 55-200 mm | 17-35 mm |
| Aperture (difference) | f/4.0-5.6 | f/2.8-4.0 |
| Prime | No | No |
| Stabilization (difference) | Yes | No |
Verdict
Pick Model A if you need a longer telephoto reach for subjects like sports or wildlife, or if image stabilization (VR) is critical for handheld shooting. Choose Model B if you prioritize a wider field of view for landscapes or architecture, or if the faster f/2.8 aperture at the wide end is essential for low-light performance. Model A stays the better choice if versatility across a broader zoom range matters more, while Model B is the clear winner if wide-angle flexibility and brighter apertures align with your shooting needs.