Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm f/3.5-5.6G IF-ED VR vs Sigma 8-16mm f/4.5-5.6 DC HSM - Monture Nikon
Prices & availability
Specification comparison
Highlighted rows differ between the two models.
| Specification | Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm f/3.5-5.6G IF-ED VR | Sigma 8-16mm f/4.5-5.6 DC HSM - Monture Nikon |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Mount | nikon-f | nikon-f |
| Optics | ||
| Focal (difference) | 24-120 mm | 8-16 mm |
| Aperture (difference) | f/3.5-5.6 | f/4.5-5.6 |
| Prime | No | No |
| Stabilization (difference) | Yes | No |
Verdict
Pick Model A if you need a versatile mid-range zoom for everyday shooting, portraits, or travel, and want a brighter f/3.5 aperture at the wide end. Choose Model B if ultra-wide-angle coverage is your priority and you’re working with a tight budget, as its 8-16mm range is unmatched for landscapes or architecture at this price. Model A stays the better choice if low-light performance or longer reach matters, while Model B is the clear winner for extreme wide-angle needs without spending more.