Sigma 105mm f/2.8 EX DG Macro OS HSM - Monture Nikon vs Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG Macro HSM - Monture Nikon
Prices & availability
Specification comparison
Highlighted rows differ between the two models.
| Specification | Sigma 105mm f/2.8 EX DG Macro OS HSM - Monture Nikon | Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG Macro HSM - Monture Nikon |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Mount | nikon-f | nikon-f |
| Optics | ||
| Focal (difference) | 105 mm | 70-200 mm |
| Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Prime (difference) | Yes | No |
| Stabilization (difference) | Yes | No |
Verdict
Pick Model A if you need a true 1:1 macro lens with a longer fixed focal length for detailed close-ups. Choose Model B if versatility matters more—its zoom range and constant f/2.8 aperture suit both macro and general telephoto use, especially at a lower price. Model A stays the better choice if working distance and minimal distortion are critical for macro work. Opt for Model B if budget constraints or the need for flexible framing outweigh specialized macro performance.