Sigma 14mm f/1.8 DG HSM ART - Monture Canon EF vs Zeiss Milvus 35mm f/1.4 ZE - Monture Canon EF
Prices & availability
Specification comparison
Highlighted rows differ between the two models.
| Specification | Sigma 14mm f/1.8 DG HSM ART - Monture Canon EF | Zeiss Milvus 35mm f/1.4 ZE - Monture Canon EF |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Mount | canon-ef | canon-ef |
| Optics | ||
| Focal (difference) | 14 mm | 35 mm |
| Aperture (difference) | f/1.8 | f/1.4 |
| Prime | Yes | Yes |
| Stabilization | No | No |
| Build | ||
| Weight (g) (difference) | 1,185,000 g | — |
Verdict
Pick the Sigma 14mm f/1.8 if you need an ultra-wide-angle prime for astrophotography, architecture, or tight interior spaces—its faster aperture and wider field of view justify the identical price. Choose the Zeiss Milvus 35mm f/1.4 if you prefer a versatile, slightly longer focal length for street, environmental portraits, or documentary work, where its 35mm perspective and marginally brighter f/1.4 aperture better suit handheld shooting. The Sigma remains the only option if wide-angle performance is non-negotiable, while the Zeiss stays the better choice if you prioritize a more natural, less distorted framing.