Sigma 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6 EX APO DG OS - Monture Canon EF vs Tokina Opera 16-28mm f/2.8 FF - Monture Canon EF
Prices & availability
Specification comparison
Highlighted rows differ between the two models.
| Specification | Sigma 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6 EX APO DG OS - Monture Canon EF | Tokina Opera 16-28mm f/2.8 FF - Monture Canon EF |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Mount | canon-ef | canon-ef |
| Optics | ||
| Focal (difference) | 80-400 mm | 16-28 mm |
| Aperture (difference) | f/4.5-5.6 | f/2.8 |
| Prime | No | No |
| Stabilization (difference) | Yes | No |
Verdict
Pick the Sigma 80-400mm if you need long telephoto reach for wildlife, sports, or distant subjects and can accept a variable, slower aperture. Choose the Tokina Opera 16-28mm if you prioritize wide-angle versatility, a fast constant f/2.8 aperture for low light, and landscape or architectural photography. The Sigma stays the better choice if budget flexibility allows for a tripod or higher ISO to offset its dimmer maximum aperture, while the Tokina remains ideal if your work demands a bright, ultra-wide zoom.